Would you read a cursed book, if you had one? [p. 54]
Well, Ariel Manto, a lonely PhD student on the outlandish Victorian scientist Thomas Lumas and heroine of The End of Mr. Y (by Scarlett Thomas), does. Guess what the title of the cursed book is?
In 2008 the novel was nominated for the Orange Prize for Fiction — one of the reasons why I wanted to read it. But which book addict would NOT put a page turner about a mysterious publication on his or her reading list? I read The End of Mr. Y while recovering from the flu and quite loved it. At times it has a really feverish plot! I’m just not sure about the ending… Intellectually I would have liked it to end differently, but sick & sentimental me sort of felt good about it.
The End of Mr. Y is a thought experiment wrapped in a contemporary adventure story that asks questions about thought, language, destiny, and the very limits of being and time. I didn’t think of that myself, I just copied Wikipedia ;) What does the book itself say on the topic?
[though experiments] are experiments that, for whatever reason, cannot be physically carried out, but must instead be conducted internally, via logic and reasoning, in the mind. There have been ethical and philosophical thought experiments for hundreds, if not thousands, of years but it was when people began using the experiments in a scientific context that they were first given the title ‘thought experiment’, a literal translation of gedankenexperiment, although Lumas had always referred to them as ‘experiments of the mind’. [..] Edgar Allan Poe used the principles of the thought experiment to solve the Olbers Paradox, and, some people believe, to more or less invent the Big Bang theory a good hundred years before anyone else [..] somthing close to the way he described infinity, as the “thought of a thought”.[p.95]
So not only is The End of Mr. Y a book-in-a-book, but also a thought experiment about thought experiments… Well, although I did write down the quote, I didn’t think about these things while reading. I was way too much carried away by the story!
Another quote, about quantum physics, brought two other books to mind: One, by Richard Bach (today I wouldn’t be caught dead reading it LOL), and Child in Time, by the well-respected author Ian McEwan.
There’s the many-worlds interpretation. In a nutshell, while the Copenhagen interpretation suggests that all probabilities collapse into one definite reality on observation, the many-worlds interpretation suggests that all the possibilities exist at once, but that each one has its own universe to go with it.
I hope I am not putting anyone off by these ‘scientific’ quotes. Just look at some of the excerpts on the book’s homepage to get a real taste of it!
Scarlett Thomas obviously likes to play with words. The name of the book’s protagonist, Ariel Manto, is an anagram of I am not real. And the Victorian writer Thomas Lumas has part of his name in common with the author herself. It made me contemplate about the name of Mr. Y, but I couldn’t come up with any nice theories. I’ll be glad to hear yours! I’ve thought about:
- Mr. Why
- Mr. Y being the opposite of, or familiair to the more well-known Mr. X
- (maybe my best guess) x and y being opposites in a coordinate system, creating dimensions; this book being about other dimensions, you could think of the x-axis (horizontal) being our ‘ordinary’ world and ‘y’ going away from that. I hope I am not sounding too foolish? :\
I considered releasing The End of Mr. Y as part of the Utopian/Dystopian Sunday Sunset Release of February 1st (yes, that long ago), since the novel is definitely dystopian (about a society in which conditions of life are miserable). But because this book was a Random Act of Bookcrossing Kindness by rapturina, I figured I couldn’t just leave it somewhere out there in the cold, cold world. Now I am happy to have found it a new destiny: sterestherster, and Gondaaa after her; tweeps that have joined some other twitter people in a real life book group — and their next read is The End of Mr. Y. I hope they’ll write a (short) journal entry when they have finished it, because it is always nice to know what other readers think. The social web provides a great new dimension to our lives!
I am not afraid of bringing more people in danger because even though my health was weak, I still survived The End of Mr. Y (phew!). I guess the curse has diminished! Or has it?
* * *
My remark about the social web just reminded me… several weekly geeks asked about this book when I posted ‘Help me catch up on book reviews‘. I have already implicitly answered Dreamybee‘s, Maree’s and (most of) Jackie’s questions above, but there are two left that I want to touch on briefly.
Bart asked what I thought of the story-in-the-story. Can I just say: hey, I like reading about books?! :) I’m not sure what you want to know exactly. It’s a bit much to really go into details of the story itself — and I must admit: a bit too long ago as well!
Also Trisha wanted to know what the book says about the unconscious mind… I feel really DUMB now, but I have no idea. It is a mishmash of philosophical and scientific theories put into a quick and believable read. You wonder how Thomas managed to make such a coherent story of it. I feel I’ve done a worse job with this blogpost… :( Can’t blame the flu anymore, can I?! ;)
8 reacties
Comments feed for this article
woensdag 9 september 2009 bij 17:57
Jackie (Farm Lane Books)
I loved this book and you have added to my appreciation of it with this review – I has no idea that Ariel Manto was an anagram! I’m afraid i can’t help you with Mr. Y, but if you find out please let me know!
Great review!
woensdag 9 september 2009 bij 22:24
Trisha
Awesome gnoe! And hey maybe my question is unanswerable because it’s not in the book! This book sounds really interesting.
donderdag 10 september 2009 bij 09:00
gnoegnoe
Phew, thanks for saying that! I thought you had read the book and had all kinds of interesting theories… :)
donderdag 10 september 2009 bij 02:41
Dreamybee
I’m glad I am not the only one still catching up on my reviews! I can see why it took you a while to get to this one; it sounds like a difficult book to write a review on, but very interesting.
maandag 16 november 2009 bij 00:35
chasing bawa
This is a great review, and very well thought out. I absolutely loved this book, and like you, I like reading about books in books. It’s a pretty difficult book to review as the story itself is so multi-faceted and complex.
By the way, can I just say that I enjoy your reviews, but I am very impressed with your multicultural obentos!
donderdag 4 februari 2010 bij 20:26
Susan
I reread this book in January, when it is set…the post-holiday time of let down and winter, it is so much a book about trying to get a warm place away from winter (a mousehole?), with mixed results. It is a such an unlikely marriage, of chick lit to -what?- pop philosophy? Pop physics? Yet it’s very successful. The pastiche story inside is an amusing take on the forbidden knowledge trope.
vrijdag 5 maart 2010 bij 12:52
temp
I think it’s maybe meant to be ‘Mystery’ – there’s a line in the book which mentions ‘the end of mystery’…
zondag 18 september 2011 bij 16:49
Leeswammes
I’ve now read the book too, and I never consider reading more into it than what I saw. But of course, a book like this may have a lot of hidden ideas. I didn’t realise about the anagram and to be honest, hadn’t given the title a second thought either! Thanks for explaining/suggesting. The End of Mystery (above) is also an interesting option.